Wednesday, October 19, 2016

Whereas...

     "Whereas, we are saddened and outraged at the recent escalation of hateful rhetoric against Muslims, those perceived to be Muslims, immigrants, and all people of color, and we are particularly concerned to see political figures and elected officials leading this escalation and using it to gain power".
             -Greensboro City Council resolution from the October 18, 2016 meeting

     I only recently became aware of this "resolution" stuff when the council decided to make a resolution to tell our District Attorney how to do his job as they were apologizing to a convicted habitual felon for having the nerve to arrest him after not allowing him to break into his mother's house for the third time.  As it has been explained to me these resolutions are not introduction of ordinance or law and are only meant to be "suggestions" or perhaps "policy stances".  Fortunately, our District Attorney gave the previous resolution to reconsider charging a police officer in a case where he did nothing wrong (again) the appropriate consideration by rejecting it immediately for the piece of comedic material it was.  Our DA knows a good "joke" when he sees it.  So do I.
     As I watched the video clip of last night's episode of Progressive Smoke and Mirrors", my first thought was a very basic one; what the heck does this have to do with the effective running of city government?  Answer; not a doggone thing. This is another in a long line of resolutions, creations of "special" days, and targeting of a large quantity of Greensboro residents in an effort to deny, deflect and distract from the massive failure this Mayor's and this Council's policies and lack of action on important city matters has been.  The very wording of the above paragraph is hypocritical and Jamal Fox's efforts to not answer a question last night from Tony Wilkins by attempting to put him on the spot and offering to add Wilkins' name to the resolution was bush league at best.  Fox has followed Nancy Vaughn this past year, skipping merrily down the path of boisterous left wing extremism in lieu of actually presenting even one single morsel of positive ideas or legislation that would be helpful to his constituents.  You see, as happens everywhere else that progressive politicians have had significant time to rule. the economic failures are such that they have to convince city residents that social issues are more important to tackle than the business of running the city.  Deny, deflect, attack dissenting opinions and assign them the blame; take no responsibility.
     BUT, when in Rome......right?

Whereas, I am saddened and outraged;

That Greensboro has the highest unemployment rate and non-participation in the work force rate in North Carolina and YOU, City Council have done absolutely nothing to address it.

That Greensboro has the second highest rate of poverty of comparable cities in North Carolina and we are about to overtake Durham for first, and YOU have done nothing to address it.

That Greensboro has the highest percentage of food stamp usage in North Carolina and YOU have done nothing to address it.

That YOU still assess the highest property taxes in North Carolina on Greensboro citizens despite your failures in all other economic areas.

That Mayor Vaughn and her council minions have undermined the police department administration and imposed your extremist social agenda on how officers perform their duties, placing them in more danger than they normally would be, taking away their discretion and choosing which laws you deem unfit to follow.  This government suppression of proactive policing and refusal to enforce ALL state laws have given rise to Greensboro's violent crime rate; a 25% increase.  Mayor Vaughn and the Greensboro City Council are destroying our police department.

That YOU are allowed to make resolutions such as this one while providing zero evidence of your claim.  Yes, this is a claim; you are claiming that you have specific evidence that is unquestionable that there is "recent escalation" of these items mentioned in your resolution.  Since you are charged with representing the people of Greensboro we can surmise that you are speaking of Greensboro citizens.  To speak of anyone else would simply not be your concern or what you have been elected to do.

That council is wasting time and effort on ridiculous resolutions that accomplish nothing but further division and isolation of citizens that have no representation or voice on this council.

That Jamal Fox used this issue last night to "to gain political power".  Your amateurish attack on Mr. Wilkins and your grandstanding to the crowd was evidence of your lack of ability to bring anything positive to this city.  I'm used to you ignoring and deceiving the folks in my area of District 2 but now you seem empowered the past few months to be more aggressive in your criticisms of anything to the right of extreme left.  Quite frankly you look foolish doing it.

That city government has slowed to a social issue crawl, never seems to attack the real issues and has not come up with one effective idea to right the sinking ship that is Greensboro.  Our Mayor and her minions spend more time pissing off state legislature and giving undeserved thousands of tax payer dollars to criminals than they do governing.

That this council who regularly celebrates tolerance, displays absolute intolerance of any dissent to their agenda.  Was that really Sharon Hightower lecturing on decorum last night?  

     I could go on and on and on.  Rehashing what we know is now the consistent norm for this council would be an exercise in futility.  Only a sweeping change in our next city election will solve Greensboro's ills.  The only way that occurs is a sweeping change in our voter participation.  We know the 11.5% of registered voters that did vote is not a mandate by any stretch yet these left wing extremists council people act as if it was.  What do the other 88.5% think?  Or are they the ones with their house for sale and looking to escape to a place in North Carolina where the economy is trending positively?  Their choices are many; that's most every place but Greensboro.
     One of my facebook friends posted a thought provoking, insightful and seemingly accurate post.

     "Blue lives don't care about Red lives in Greensboro".

For a Mayor and Council that are constantly touting their ratings on tolerance and inclusiveness, why don't you try these traits out on your own population.  I found it very interesting watching Nancy Vaughn call down and invoke decorum on Mr. Wilkins last night.  When I see you do that as quickly and as fervently on Lewis Pitts or any of Nelson Johnson's crew, only then will I take you seriously.
     I make the resolution that we stop with useless resolutions that are specifically designed to cause more division and target citizens that do not agree with left wing progressive agendas.  Try to paint it anyway you like; this resolution was created to specifically target conservatives in general and yes Mr. Fox, Tony Wilkins in particular.  Your intent was to corner him into voting for this resolution or portray him as something he is not if he didn't vote for it.

     "I can attach your name to it if you want Mr. Wilkins?  Either vote yes or no"

You just did attach his name to it Jamal.  Bush league.  Non professional.  Cheap political ploy to gain power.  You used this issue to gain what you stated you were "saddened and outraged" about.  That makes you Jamal Fox, a hypocrite.  

108 comments:

  1. Waaaah waaaaaahhh. Black people make me mad. Boo boo.

    Will you still be voting for a SEX OFFENDER that "grabs em by the pussy"

    Wilkins is toast. I bet he went home and got drunk off his KKK sympathizing ads last night.

    Did you ask him about the curly ridgill poster yet. He was laughing hysterically at curly.
    OK HYPOCRITE and remember that Corey Daniel is a PEDOPHILE who gets CHILD PORNOGRAPHY. TIME TO "WARN PARRENTS"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. All I can say to this comment is, at least we can vote, felons cannot.

      Delete
    2. Only 4 states prohibit felons from voting. This is not one of them

      Delete
    3. actually, it is against federal law for you to vote in a federal election. Additionally, in NC you can vote as a felon. only if you have your rights established if you are a non-violent offender and you have petitioned the courts.

      Delete
    4. Yet another misinformed lie. But keep thinking that..............

      Delete
    5. Typical republinazi, trying to trick people into not voting..................... That's the only way they can win is to prevent people (usually black) from voting.

      Delete
  2. Replies
    1. Tony Wilkins outed himself during that debacle, he brought attention to the fact that people view him as racist.

      Delete
    2. I do not believe Mr. Wilkins is a racist..well not like Her Holiness Hightower.

      Mr. Wilkins was pointing out a fact reference to parliamentary procedure of; if you are going to make a resolution, then by all means state who you intent your audience to be. if you are going to place blame upon a "elected official" then isn't it prudent to name such official.

      I would compare this to saying for instance at the city counsel meeting...one of the counsel members does not like supporting a certain organization. I am sure everyone would go through hell and high water to find out who that was, as was Mr. Wilkins attempting to do

      Delete
    3. Wilkins sides with the KKK on the 11/3/79 issue. He calls that mass murder a shootout. It SHOULD have been a shootout. The communist should have come with AK-47's and EXTERMINATED the ENTIRE KKK and not just the scumbags that were here in GSO.

      By default, republicans are racist. Black Republicans are deplorable uncle toms. They oppose civil rights, they endorse police terror and mass incarceration all things that serve as population control against black people.

      Delete
    4. So you encourage mass violence?

      I have not been subject to population control. I grew up dirt poor and proudly served my country and my countrymen, so people as yourself have the right to freedom of speech.

      As for mass murder, I have seen mass murder, genocide, and pure racial hatred in many countries; first hand. The communist and kkk incident is far from mass murder.

      mass murder is what occurred in Orlando and what is happening in Syria

      Delete
    5. Since our government is soft on white supremacy by refusing to call it terror it is up to the people to prevent terrorists like the kkk from being allowed to exist. Exterminating them is good for humanity.

      The kkk has NO rights or freedoms. Fuck their civil liberties.

      Conservative Black people who are soft on racism are part of what makes them uncle Toms.

      The US military is responsible for the biggest terror attacks in human history. They both happened in 1945 to innocent Japanese civilians. Being a trained killer for the US government does NOT improve your standing.

      You are too indoctrinated by capitalism and white supremacist America to know the difference. Sad indeed.

      Delete
  3. I am sorry I have not been able to post here lately, however other matters of national security have been more pressing.

    This may be a very long post and I hope it all fits.
    I am disgusted at the city council and at the speakers from the floor, who believe that only police can cause brutality. Notice no one even mentioned, shed a tear, or had a moment of silence for the slaying of the security guard who was trying to put food on his families table? Was there an outcry from any white people that this person was targeted because he looked like a police officer? No, it would not fit the agenda of the cronies who run this city. It would make them look bad in front of their own people.

    I would like to begin this part by agreeing with Mr. Ridgill the city council meeting was in my own words; a mayhem. The go as far as to pass a resolution to limit free speech and free exchange of ideas. I am sure one person on here is going to throw a fit so I will expound. By passing a resolution with less teeth than an anteater, to say we should not use offensive terms in our lives. Saying that we condemn hate speech and will not allow it to occur is a stab at the core of our Constitution.

    I can honestly say, because of activities that I have experienced in our wonderful world, there are people that I have no problem calling out. Telling them I do not like you because of an experience I have had with you in the past. Does this mean that I hate all people in this group? Yes and no; I may have a problem with a certain organization such as; the KKK, BLM, Black Panthers, and Military Religious Freedom Foundation. I hate the core of their being trying to champion a narrow minded idea of how the world should be according to them. But if I speak ill of them does this now hold me in contempt of this impotent resolution? Or as some in the audience referred to it as “a bill”. I guess it does. Just as the people who said “black lives matter” at the podium are in violation of the resolution but that is covered by free speech.

    Which brings me to my next part. The speakers from the audience think this was a bill and it should be binding only to the police department. My question to them is, when you call a police officer out of his or her name, what is the ramifications for you? The honest answer is absolutely nothing. I am sorry to tell this to our future leaders, you cannot have it both ways.

    This brings me to another point about the speakers from the floor. This “innocent” young black woman who was arrested for trespassing admitted she did not know she was kicked out but then said she tried to get her money back?? Why would someone ask for money back unless they were kicked out? It is not like she did not enjoy the entertainment and demand a refund. That would be like going to a restaurant ordering food and not paying because you did not like the taste. Furthermore, she didn’t know who arrested her? I cry a big foul on this. Her paperwork where she had her charges filed has the officer’s name on there. Additionally, are we to believe that she was just picked out at random and handcuffed and was treated badly because she was black? Or could we believe she was most probably drunk and was being an entitled little brat.

    Lastly, again with this odd resolution, it goes out of its way to identify Muslims as only black. There are a lot of Muslims in this great city and guess what; more of them are from the Slavic countries and are as white as the day is long. Remember, city council and members of the community a lizard has many spots.

    ReplyDelete
  4. If you hate patriots like black lives matter and upstanding freedom fighters like the black panthers because they do not say "all lives matter" but do not object to "blue lives matter" then the word that pisses you off is BLACK.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The best way to deal with ALL religion is to abolish it. What kind of mental patient talks to an invisible man in the sky?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Four items. I do not hate the word black, why would I hate myself? The best song ever is by the Stones "Paint it black" Allen West is a black man and a patriot.

    Also, ask Nelson Johnson, why he talks to a invisible man in the sky. Oh you can't you would violate the city council resolution.

    The black panthers are a terrorist organization which has ties to Hamas and attempted to blow up government buildings in the United States.

    Guess what the fourth one is?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Allen West defines uncle tom as do his "black" admirers. Allen West is Wayne Brady and Ben Vereen without all that "soul" that Bryant Gumbel has.

      The FBI and the LAPD are the terrorist organizations the heroic Black Panthers were fighting. Those terrorists blew up and killed many members of the panthers for doing nothing more than wanting to end police terror.

      Delete
    2. please post the citations for these claims, I am interested in seeing them, really.

      Delete
    3. The movie "black panthers, Vanguard of a revolution" would be very informative to anyone who wants to know about the police terror the black panthers were fighting.

      Delete
    4. a movie is not a citation, it is a vision of a person's own idea. As are most documentaries. I was hoping for more solid citations.

      Delete
    5. I have seen it and again, it is a documentary. Hell the Nazi's made their own documentaries which showed Jews, Gypsies, and other groups they did not care for as the enemy. does this mean the Nazi documentaries are correct?

      Delete
    6. You do not strike me as the type who watches PBS, especially when they are portraying civil rights leaders in a positive light. I call bullshit.

      Delete
    7. Actually you are correct I do not watch PBS because I do not agree with their agenda (my right). The point I was trying to make is, you can make a documentary that can cherry pick ideas that make one side look better, hence my comparison to the Nazi documentaries. Not just Nazi documentaries, but documentaries from other totalitarian governments.

      You can watch the documentary other places besides PBS.

      Delete
    8. If you have not seen the film you are not qualified to talk about them.

      Delete
    9. I have.

      You have never been a prosecutor, defense attorney, police officer, judge, jury member, nor a forensic force scientist. But you still talk about police brutality. What is your expertise besides being arrested?

      Delete
    10. Also, why do you refer to Allen West as an uncle tom?

      Delete
    11. I have eyes and can see the video for myself, anyone who defends the actions of police in these brutality cases at this point should be placed in prison. This is why we need the black panthers to this day. they have thew BEST ways to stop cops from beating and shooting the public.

      Delete
    12. Look up the definition of uncle tom and get back with me. Also include Uncle Clarence Thomas in that mix too.

      Delete
    13. So by your logic, if I supported the rioting of people who riot and loot, should I be locked up too? It is not like anyone supports or defends officers who do in fact inflict undue harm upon a person. but you do realize as a nation and states have given authority for officers to utilize force to effect a detention and or an arrest. Show me a use of force that looks pretty. Additionally, as one of our brilliant city council members stated "a video only gives 25%" of what happens.

      Delete
    14. Actually asshole ridgill defends police brutality all the time. Police unions like the Greensboro police officers assn exist to defend police brutality.

      Delete
    15. This being my last entry for this evening because, I have a meeting with God very early. Because the two black men whom you mention rose up to well respected positions, they are uncle toms? because they did well for themselves (except Thomas..pubes on a coke can!!)

      Delete
    16. I see you did not look up the definition of uncle tom, Uncle clarence thomas voted against affirmative action even though that's how he got into law school, that defines uncle tom.

      Delete
    17. Do you often meet with non existent invisible men in the sky? seek mental help.

      Delete
  7. Also, I was hoping for a more well thought out and lucid response to my post. However, I am greatly dismayed. So much for a friendly debate

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Your post has to be lucid for me to respond in a lucid way. Is that "lucid" enough.

      Delete
  8. Not particularly. It just goes to show that all you can do is spew nonsensical hate without facts.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You have me confused with the orange guy with a dead rat on his head, the sex offender that "grabs em by the pussy" while running for president.

      Delete
  9. He has never been accused, charged, or convicted as a sex offender. A sex offender has to be a person convicted of such a crime.

    http://www.mass.gov/eopss/crime-prev-personal-sfty/sex-offenders/levels-of-sex-offenders.html

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. actually there are currently 8 women accusing him of being a sex offender

      Delete
    2. been accused of a unwanted sexual advances. one has already been debunked. please use references, such as I have. I would make for a much lively conversation.

      Delete
    3. do your own research. I am not going to waste time citing things you will not accept. NONE of his accusers have been "debunked" he is still a SEX OFFENDER

      Delete
    4. I have done my research. By pure definition he is not a sex offender, because he has not been tried and convicted. He might be a pervert, but that is not against the law.

      Delete
    5. So do you have a "grab em by the pussy 2016" bumper sticker?

      Delete
    6. nope still got my hillary for prison sticker, my ross perot sticker, and my; "ass, grass, or gas..no one rides for free"

      Delete
    7. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    8. Both hillary and the dead rat on his head guy belong in prison. I would have supported bernie but he is still a bit too conservative. We need a presidential candidate who believes in reparations for slavery.

      Delete
    9. Why would we need that? Can anyone now say they have direct relation to a particular slave? In addition, there were reparations given. Most if not all former slaves refused the offer.

      If you truly believe in that concept, would you vote for a tax increase on the people who have to give it back to themselves? and have you given any? Why should the governments of Africa not be liable for reparations. they are the ones who sold their own people into slavery.

      Delete
    10. We should raid wall st and the current corporate holdings of other corporations that exist today that profited from slave labor.

      Delete
    11. again, what reparations have you repaid

      Delete
    12. I work to dismantle white supremacy in ALL of it's forms, including the republican party.

      Delete
    13. If you are working to dismantle white supremacy, then you might want to dismantle yourself. I am a black man; and your overt and covert hatred of people makes you a white supremacist.

      Delete
    14. You need to research the term white supremacy and while you are at it take a few African American studies courses. Perhaps you wouldn't be in favor of a party that is blatantly racist

      Delete
    15. Why do I need to take any courses? I am black and I have my own experiences and do not need someone telling me something from an opinionated book. I am interested on how, which I assume you mean the Republican Party, is racist? They enacted the civil rights act, got rid of jim crow era laws.

      I am conservative and hold no party affiliation. I served my country and have seen what both parties have done to my once great nation.

      Delete
    16. The republinazi party has the endorsement of every white supremacy group in existence.

      Delete
    17. please cite your source, no opinion please

      Delete
    18. Look it up genius. I'm not doing your homework

      Delete
    19. Is this because you have no sources? I have all the citations and sources in the world at my finger tips. I am sure because of your background you are banned from going to certain websites and to libraries.

      Delete
    20. Google it asswipe, stop being lazy. There were numerous news articles to that effect. I think you are a white cop PRETENDING to be a black civilian who sucks up to police, pathetic indeed.

      Delete
    21. Dont forget that thanks to the police corruption that I protest JW (take it out) Way and Corey (send me a picture) Daniel are free to go to as many schools, parks and libraries as they want. for every private citizen you TRY to shame I have TWO greensboro cops who were literally caught with their pants down in the same situations. Your hypocrisy on the subject is amusing.

      I am sure because of YOUR background, every civil rights group in existence has banned you from their property for extreme uncle tomism and conduct unbecoming of a black activist.

      Delete
    22. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/what-jorge-ramos-found-after-talking-to-hate-groups-in-the-age-of-trump_us_580ad634e4b000d0b156e8f4?section=

      Delete
  10. Thanks Bryan. This conversation between a person who did not resort to name calling and offensive slurs and yourself, vile, repulsive and uneducated has completely given thousands of readers reason to completely discount anything you say. He just intellectually stomped you. A fat, white communist talking about successful African Americans being an "Uncle Tom". You've reached a new ignorance low. Now when are you going to vote? Nyuk, nyuk, nyuk.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Yes, he "stomped me" like the Orange sex offender "stomped" the wall street woman at the debate the other night. Not at all. She mopped the floor with him. Any "black" person who considers the black panthers to be terrorists has a profound misunderstanding of race and history.

    An uncle tom is a white acting, stiff black man conservative and working to suppress their own race. The voting record of both uncle Clarence Thomas and Allen "Ben vereen" west shows their disdain for their own people. By default a white republinazi is a racist and a black republinazi is an uncle tom.

    Voted yesterday asshat.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Thousands of readers" my ass, you have 16 followers fuckface. Seek mental help for you delusions of grandeur.

      Delete
    2. I am a little disappointed, I wasn't looking for a win or lose. I was merely trying to present facts and have a valid discussion. I take insults with a grain of salt.

      Mr. Ridgill, I truly commend you on your work now and give you a hand shake for stepping up to be a police officer; without people like you, we could not have this coversation. Not being one myself, I cannot begin to imagine all the hate that must have been tossed at you over the years.

      Delete
    3. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    4. A black guy sucking up to the police. Cluelessness personification. Somebody is ignorant of the role police have had in keeping black people down. Even the head of the international police chiefs assn just apologised to people of color for centuries of brutality

      Delete
    5. That has to be the most racist thing that has ever come out of your mouth. Because I am black and do not subscribe to the liberal mindset that I am less of a man because of my skin color?

      The head of the IACP, is nothing more than a political puppet a voted official. As you may no know chiefs of police are appointed, like judges; our country has gone from law and order policing to appeasing people and safe zones and trigger words.

      So I am a suck up because I know that if there were no police that a person of your criminal background would be rounded up and have unspeakable things done to you. Who would come to stop such a thing?

      But we live in a society, where people of your background are protected by the the laws of the land and those swore to protect them.

      Delete
    6. I doubt you are actually a real black person. I call bullshit. I think you are PRETENDING to be black so you can pretend that uncle tom conservative blacks are are a notable portion of the political landscape.

      You are actually claiming that police protect people who are on a list CREATED and maintained by those same cops. What kind of moron are you??? Sounds like under your "logic" if that list did not exist there would be no need for the cops to "protect those people"

      You are a suck up because you think the country with the largest prison population and largest death by cop rate is "land of the free" and no not see the role police play in that by keeping america's slave labor camps (prisons) full.

      You are also an uncle tom because you do not understand "law and order" is redneck code for lock up as many black people as possible.

      "appeasing people" is also known as stopping police racism, brutality and putting trigger happy (opiate addicted) killer cops IN PRISON.

      So cops are hero's to you but the most powerful cop in the country is a "figurehead" because he admitted to police racism. Yup, you are DEFINITELY in denial about police racism.

      Delete
    7. If you think that somebody calling out an uncle tom is "the most racist thing" you clearly have never counter protested the KKK. THAT is the most racist thing there is, and as usual cops were there to protect them from people of color who are smart enough to want to eradicate the KKK.

      Delete
    8. Well let me address this in turn.

      your racist statement "A black guy sucking up to the police. Cluelessness personification." not only this but i am pretending to be black? so you are marginalizing me to a specific way to act as a black person. Yes with certainty I can say you make racist statements.

      Second, police do not maintain the list you are on. The state and federal government maintain the list. The way you make it sound is it a mistake for you to be on this list?

      Yes we have a large prison population, again, as I have pointed out. You and others who commit crimes do not take responsibility for your role in the action. It is always the police's fault.

      No my law and order definition is the punishment must fit the crime. If you do not punish or even arrest violators then more violence is created.

      your referral to a police officer who is opiate addicted can be construed to you mentioning one particular officer; this is clearly in violation of your pre trial conditions. Since you will not state what those charges are....cyber stalking ring a bell?

      Actually the most "powerful cop" is actually the Attorney General of the United States.

      Lastly, you make accusations and through your opinion our there, but do not provide any empirical evidence to back it. What is your evidence the great country we live in is the top in the world of death by law enforcement?

      Delete
    9. I also have another line of inquiry; what have you done for this great nation to make it better, do you do anything else with your life besides write you hyper inflated rants and go to city council meetings and do you have any type of higher education?

      Delete
    10. You are deflecting from your uncle tomism (if you actually are black) by claiming that my disdain for black people who are soft in racism is racist. It's the classic "I know you are but what am I" deflection.

      Sounds like YOU are a stalker with all the research you have done on a PRIVATE CITIZEN who speaks out against police.

      We don't just have "high prison population" we have 5% of the world's people and 25% of the world's prisoners. You are minimizing the issue.

      There is no evidence the sex offender registry prevents sex crimes but there is mountains of evidence that proves that morons like you and the stooge use it as a weapon to distract from the issues I raise about dirty cops.

      Why not a robbery registry, maybe a arsonists registry or even a burglary registry. ALL of those crimes have a higher recidivism rate than the 5% recidivism rate of sex offenders (according to numerous studies you can RESEARCH YOURSELF)

      There us no point in providing evidence to someone who is there to discredit what you say. It's not like you are being truthful about who YOU are.

      Delete
    11. For the third time nothing about who I am or am not is up for discussion.

      Delete
    12. I do not deflecting, I know what I am, a citizen of the United States of America. Only racists place labels (besides criminal ones) upon a person because of their race.

      I agree with your there does need to be a registry for all felony offenses especially burglary. If we had that Yourse would have been exposed on that.

      Again, which studies are you referring to? People can make 75% of the claims that are false, 50% of people know that.

      Just to make you blow up...what did Mable think when her "little" boy when to prison?

      Delete
    13. You are a sad "black" man indeed. You have distorted the term racism to fit YOUR pathetic argument about how YOU are are somehow not an uncle tom (if you really are black)

      I dont think you are inferior because you are rumored to be black, THAT would be racist. I think you are inferior because you tolerate racism and white supremacy and make excuses for a criminal justice system that has been proven to target black people.

      I never said there needs to be a registry for felons I said that the current registry is there to keep people in a permanent underclass some of the worst atrocities have been committed by people to "protect" them. You are using it as a weapon so obedient little trolls can feel superior in the fact that they do not question authority. I think there needs to be an uncle tom's registry for black people without enough self respect to stand up and identify racism and fight it when they see it.

      There is NO EVIDENCE that the sex offender registry has EVER prevented a sex crime (provide me PROOF otherwise Mr empirical data) and with the 5% recidivism rate it seems like a bunch of paranoid hysterics to me, your attitude is not based in reality.

      Who the fuck is "mable", who is her "little boy" and why did he go to prison???

      At least you admit you are here to make me "blow up" or make me "mad" in other words..... to harass, annoy or otherwise embarrass me, sounds ALOT like the LEGAL DEFINITION of cyberstalking to me.

      Delete
    14. Actually you said "Why not a robbery registry, maybe a arsonists registry or even a burglary registry. ALL of those crimes have a higher recidivism rate than the 5% recidivism rate of sex offenders". That is calling for a registry.

      The mere fact of there being a registry prohibits sex offenders from being in certain places, so in fact it does prevent sex crimes.

      This being my last post for the evening, I have family matters to take care of. I would like to leave you with these two things...#1. you would know the the cyber stalking laws are. According to law I do not have any "criminal intent" ask FBI director Comey about that. #2. You now cry foul because I am doing to you what you have been doing to others for such a long time? Is it because you cannot take your own medicine?

      But finally, great Huntville TX mugshot!

      good night and god bless.

      Delete
    15. I can tell that picking up on sarchasm like "why not have a robbery registry" is not a strong point of yours, next time I will I will label sarchasm as such so you and curly ridgill do not mistake it for factual speech.

      You STILL have not provided DATA, FACTS, EMPIRICAL STUDIES that prove sex offender registries "prevent crime". That is the standard you wanted of me remember?

      Again there is NO EVIDENCE that a sex offender registry has EVER prevented a sex crime.

      95% of all sex crimes are committed by people not on a registry. The department of justice said this in several crime stat studies.

      If a sex offender wants to kidnap a kid from a park or expose himself ON DUTY loike SEX OFFENDER JE WAY of the GPD did, do you think a law saying they can't go will stop them???

      What criminal intent did that guy have when he called out that killer cop with a pill habit?? NONE, it was to expose police corruption that you deny exists.

      YOUR cyberstalking statements are for the purpose of silencing dissent and criticism of the government which proves YOUR nefarious criminal intent.

      There is no god. You have provided no PROOF of the existence of god. You are a liar, stooge and if you actually are black you are an uncle tom of the highest order.

      You make Wayne Brady look like James Brown, you are NOT openly black, I am willing to bet cash you have never said "say it loud, I'm black and I'm proud"

      Delete
    16. Well according to "95% of all sex crimes are committed by people not on a registry" that means 5% of crimes are committed by people on the registry. Even if it stops only 1 that makes it worth.

      I cannot speak of this Way guy; I do not know anything about his case.

      Exactly how I am trying to silence you? I am debating you.

      I do not have to have empirical proof that God exists, I just know it in my heart.

      Again with your stereotyping black people. I am sorry I do not fit your perception of a black person who is reliant on others to speak for them.

      I think we are done with this subject, because we have went way off the rails and would like to get back to the subject at hand. The stupid resolution the city council passed.

      Delete
    17. So you want to jeopardize the safety and well being of 99% of FORMER offenders to in theory stop that last percentage. I even understand a PRIVATE police only list but a public list creates more problem for the persons family too. You are actually increasing chances of reoffense by exiling those people.

      Jamal fox did what was long overdue. Fighting racism. And why do you a "black man" object to this?

      Delete
  12. What dead person's name did you use to vote?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I voted under the name Jerome "curly" Howard.

      Nyuck Nyuck Nyuck

      Delete
    2. Of course, we all know you didn't vote under yours.

      Delete
    3. Why must you attempt to disenfranchise voters by lying to them about their voter eligibility. That is an oooollllllddddd republinazi trick to rig an election. I suppose next you will tell me there is a poll tax.

      Delete
    4. Do you pay attention to the nonsense that comes out of your mouth? Perfect deflection. You vote illegally then try to deflect away from the law and blame conservatives. I'm going to look up and see if you voted under your name.

      Delete
    5. I can tell you are proficient in voter policy. NOT. You are not qualified to say what is legal or not. You prove that, just like you predicted a "slam dunk conviction" on the murdering druggies perjurous warrants.

      Delete
    6. Careful now, you are close to violating your court release papers until your trial. What are they for again?

      Delete
    7. Speaking out against the police is a crime in Greensboro.

      Delete
    8. No I do not think that is a crime in itself. Could you please be a bit more accurate? I believe facts over opinion.

      Delete
    9. Why is it none of my business? You seem comfortable airing other people's laundry. Should you not air your own?

      “Whoever is careless with the truth in small matters cannot be trusted with important matters”
      ― Albert Einstein

      Delete
    10. Nothing about who I am or am not is up for discussion. Goad me all you want that will not change.

      Delete
    11. I am not trying to "goad" you, I am trying to get you to open up. You have a lot of hate in your heart, why do you carry such hate?

      Delete
    12. As a "black" person why are you so anti black?

      Delete
    13. I am not anti-black, I am pro everyone; I look for the good in everyone's soul not matter race, color, creed, etc.

      But nice try dodging yet another question.

      Delete
    14. You are NOT pro black panther or black lives matter.

      Delete
    15. You are correct, because I do not believe in their ideas and beliefs, which are they are for themselves and not for anyone else. I die a little bit more inside when people such as yourself do not know what it is like to be black.

      Please stick to subjects you may have some experience or knowledge in.

      Delete
    16. Also, why have you changed the course of this conversation yet again? I am trying to stick to one topic in this portion, which is your pending charges.

      Delete
    17. And I told you nothing about who I am or am not is up for discussion

      Delete
    18. Well I know who you are, it is not hard to find out your name, facebook profile, address, what political party you are affiliated with. Not to mention past and pending charges against you.

      I am simply trying to get you to open up some. You want to throw the blame game around and talk bad about others, but you have not even taken responsibility for your own actions and in-actions.

      Delete
    19. I guess you are shit out of luck.

      I'm bored with you

      Buh bye

      Delete
    20. Well I hate to see you go. I am sure we will meet at a city council meeting one day, maybe even have a civil conversation.

      Delete
  13. Dirty cops send innocent man to prison, city must pay up because of police corruption.http://www.greensboro.com/news/crime/city-to-pay-armstrong-million-for-wrongful-conviction/article_8d06b863-06a1-5b32-b94e-9bab76decb89.html

    ReplyDelete
  14. Actually, if you read the error was on the side of the SBI, funny the latent examiner did not get mentioned....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nope. The crooked cops set this innocent victim up.

      Delete
  15. Exactly how did they set this non-guilty..no one said he was innocent

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Can you read, the cops continued to pursue the case even AFTER there was abundant evidence to prove the guy was innocent.

      I know your role is to PRETEND cops are all innocent angels who do not need to be scrutinised by the general public but anyone with that mindset is naive about police conduct.

      Delete