Tuesday, January 19, 2016

Assessing a Threat (Part II) Holding Greensboro Hostage

     November 3rd, 1979.  If you have lived in Greensboro for more than a year chances are you have heard this date referenced.  There have been plenty of documents published through the years about this event that has come to dominate Greensboro politics and each new publication seems to have new "spin" on the facts and subjective conclusions that now dominate the conversation here.  Very few people in our city know the details of that horrible day, the actors and their actions or the chain of events that led up to the confrontation that has been completely mischaracterized as the "Greensboro Massacre".  The folks that do know the factual details of the event have tired of talking about it or simply given up on trying to shout over those who benefit from the spin.  Yet Greensboro has been made to endure this despicable event even though virtually no one was from this city that participated or initiated it.  Worse still, this event still has a profound and divisive effect on our city government and is having a debilitating affect on the health of our city.
     I have read a lot of documents on this case; the police reports; the communications log of radio transmissions, the Greensboro Truth and Reconciliation report, etc, etc.  For those that want a capsulized version of the event minus all rhetoric from either side you can find that here; nchistory.org under Greensboro Shootings.  I encourage everyone to read this short version then decide for yourself whether to investigate further.  It is important for our current citizens to understand this event and what occurred because in many ways it is the center piece of the left wing extremist playbook that is being used here in Greensboro to drive our city in a direction that is causing poverty, high percentages of government dependency and an increasing problem in attracting companies that will employ our citizens that desperately need jobs.
     This issue is not about democrats or republicans, conservative or liberal philosophies.  Though philosophies differ between these folks, usually morals and ethics do not.  Common ground for compromise usually exists on some level and when that bridge is built communities can thrive.  Extremists however differ greatly in morals and ethics and have no intention of trying to cooperate or compromise; it's their way or the highway and they do not care if they destroy a community to achieve their goal.  And if (heaven forbid) an extremist view point infiltrates a governing body that already has conflicts of interests or needs a diversion from the community figuring out that their policies do not work it can be a virus that brings hostility to a community; or worse, apathy.
     Nelson Johnson is that agent.  A leading member of the Worker's Viewpoint Organization in 1979 (later Communist's Workers Party), Johnson has been able to deflect any responsibility from himself or his organization and placed community perceptions of fault on the Greensboro Police Department.  He has been at this for over 35 years and has tended to be more successful as time removes those from city government and our population that actually knows the truth.  Though he has now become a minister and heads up the political group known as the Pulpit Forum, he has never publicly renounced his communist beliefs and actions.  Members and associates of his Beloved Community Center (see previous article on Mr. Subversive) continue to act on his behalf and in a manner that is reminiscent of "Nelson Johnson past", using communist rhetoric and propaganda.  Even Mr. Subversive, who was all of four years old at the time constantly and consistently refers to this event when spewing his brand of hatred and misinformation; where do you think he learned all of these misinformed facts?  Johnson and his minions have used this event in our history as a political guilt trip and is now to the point that NO politician dares call him out for his misleading accounts.  Worse still, they are allowing him to make that event in 1979 entirely about race; and it was not.
     A massacre is when an unsuspecting, unarmed group of people are brutally killed or injured with no apparent reason for the attack.  Sandy Brook Elementary School, Columbine High School and the recent  Emmanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church in Charleston, SC are examples of a "massacre".  In July of 1979 Nelson Johnson led a group of WVO activists and supporters to China Grove, NC to confront a group of Ku Klux Klan supporters because they were watching a segregationist and racist movie entitled "Birth of a Nation".  Johnson, Signe Waller and other group activists and supporters had decided that the local opposition to the KKK was not being "demonstrative" enough in challenging this right wing extremist group.  They waited outside, protesting, burning a Confederate flag in front of the group and hurling rhetorical insults back and forth.  Local law enforcement was able to diffuse the confrontation by convincing the KKK to re-enter the building allowing them to disperse the crowd.  WVO members were reportedly armed with bats, sticks and other objects.  KKK members responded with threats of guns.

     "The CWP is consciously trying to upgrade its' level of militancy to become more adept at combining legal and illegal tactics"- Signe Waller, 1979 (nchistory.org)

     For two months rhetoric, threats and insults were hurled back and forth with plans being concocted by Johnson for a "Death to the Klan" rally to be held here in Greensboro.  These plans included a written, formal invitation to the KKK to attend (I have a copy) as well as verbal challenges to the Klan televised on local TV news casts.  They included deception of the parade route and destination and consistent statements by his group in general and Johnson in particular for the police to "stay away" and to not get involved.  A far right wing extremist group of nut bags that has been pursued and challenged for months that has a history of violence has been invited to attend a rally and parade calling for their deaths.  To compound it, the hosts are a left wing extremist group of nut bags with a history of violence (regardless of what the Truth and Reconciliation report says) that has demonstrated that they WANT the KKK there after traveling to their turf to issue the challenge.  What did they think was going to happen?  Five people lost their lives because of this senseless, extremist behavior.  Greensboro has endured a black eye because one of the ring leaders stayed here.  Two vile, disgusting groups completely void of morals and ethics decided to come to Greensboro and endanger innocent citizens then blame everyone from the police to the city for their inexcusable actions; two groups using our Constitutional First Amendment to spew their own brand of hatred with neither giving a damn about the rest of the Consitution.          
     How connected is Nelson Johnson?  Apparently he has now reached the status with our inept City Manager Jim Westmoreland that he can affect police department discipline or even whether criminal charges make it to court.  Though magistrates have found probable cause on cases in which Johnson has come to the aid of defendants in the form of accusations of officers arresting "just because they were black", Westmoreland has actually encouraged charges to be dropped in lieu of being called "bad names" by Johnson.  One officer even suffered two days off without pay for an arrest Johnson decided was bad even though the officer cut the defendant a break on an "open and shut" felony charge; does that sound like a white officer wanting to get a black guy?  This along with several other similar incidents that have occurred while a man trained in civil engineering occupies a public administrative position has not only caused me to come to the conclusion that Westmoreland is unqualified for his job.  It has also made me aware that his fear of Johnson makes him no more than Nelson's female lap dog.
     So how does a man with this history of despising the police find his way onto a Community Interview Forum for the recent Chief of Police opening here in Greensboro?  The City Manager's office made those appointments.  When his candidate was not chosen, did Johnson adhere to the findings of the interview process?  Oh no; he held a news conference on the steps of city hall to protest the choice and ended the session with the chant "Greensboro, Ferguson..Ferguson, Greensboro" in reference to an event that occurred in Missouri, insinuating that corruption and race trumped qualifications though the candidate he supported was not qualified.
     You don't have to try very hard to find Johnson posing in photo ops regularly with Mayor Vaughn, Councilpersons Hightower, Fox or Abuzuaiter.  He seems to be a regular in the offices of city hall.  This man with a demonstrated philosophy of divisiveness and extremism has been granted audience in incidents that his history should suggest he have no part in; conflicts of interest seem to matter not.
     Perhaps the ultimate demonstration of his influence appears in east Greensboro in the form of a state historical marker denoting "The Greensboro Massacre".  7 of the 9 sitting Council members voted to approve this sign.  Two, Hightower and Yvonne Johnson even wrote letters of recommendation to the Historical Sign Commission (I have copies) in support of erecting the sign though both were politically savvy enough not to refer to the incident as the sign depicts.  Of course, neither saw fit to recuse themselves from that vote though a documented conflict of interest certainly existed.  The application essay for this sign conveniently leaves out all of the details leading up to the "Death to the Klan" rally and the fact that both sides fired several shots.  In essence, this sign's existence suggests that Greensboro itself was involved and that one side of the conflict somehow deserves absolution of any wrong doing though they violated virtually every requirement of their parade permit, including not being armed and Johnson meeting with police prior to the parade.  The parade even started 37 minutes earlier than agreed to evade police involvement.  Again, this was a despicable event caused by two extremist groups that somehow has evolved into legend of a "peaceful" protest interrupted by a group that just showed up and started shooting.
     The guilt that is continuously heaped on our community does not promote healing.  Greensboro is so politically fractured that growth and prosperity will not return here though other cities in our state seem to have overcome these obstacles.  The morale at the Greensboro Police Department is at an all time low, not because of police administrators but due to the absence of any articulable public support from city leaders.  As long as opportunistic antagonists have more of a platform and benefit more than citizens these obstacles cannot be overcome.  This rhetoric is used to provide smokescreens such as police bashing, to cover up the fact that Greensboro is sitting dead in the water; high poverty, high unemployment, affordable housing issues, high government dependency.  Our citizens are currently in a state of hopelessness that any of these things are close to changing as evidenced by 88.5% of registered voters not bothering to vote in the last municipal election.  People are moving out.  High School graduates are going to college never to return.  Graduates of local college and universities are not staying.  These things are the result of not only progressive policies but the acceptance and promotion of false extremist's narratives with no one willing to stand and publicly challenge them.  A difference of opinion or presentation of evidence is not demeaning or racist regardless of what folks like Nelson Johnson would have you believe; and he has spent the last 35 years shoving it down the Greensboro Police Department's throat.  Now, he has the majority of city council members and a city manager in place to back him up.  
          For my buddy "Mr. Subversive" and all of his very few like minded friends I will leave you and all my readers with one question.  From all of the reports I have read from every side and depiction of this event, three things are not in dispute.  Nelson Johnson led a group to China Grove on July 8th, 1979 to confront the Ku Klux Klan and continued threats and rhetoric for the next two months.  Nelson Johnson formally invited in writing the KKK to attend a "Death to the Klan" rally to be held on November 3rd, 1979 in Greensboro.  Nelson Johnson appeared on TV news casts daring the Klan to show up and "face the wrath of the people".  If Nelson Johnson does not do any of these three things, would an armed confrontation resulting in 5 deaths have occurred in Greensboro that day?



next:  The left wing extremist playbook

  
  

       


  

42 comments:

  1. Glenn Miller Frazier is the reason that I cite for actually having a shootout that day instead of the massacre that we actually had. We should have come WELL armed and obliterated the KKK. It would have spared the world from his terrorist attack where he killed 3 people at the jewish community center.

    You whine too much about communism Here are some facts for you to study up on the revolutionary communist party. http://revcom.us/

    There is NOTHING radical or extremist about the CWP

    The GPD is looking for new officers. Watch the video here. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RygcejCRLKA

    DEATH TO THE KLAN

    ReplyDelete
  2. Since you deleted that guy's comments I reposted them so you would not edit your way out of the truth even when it does not fit YOUR narrative.

    Author has left a new comment on the post "Assessing a Threat (Part II) Holding Greensboro H...":

    As to the wrong facts you are willing to discuss, by all means, proceed. I provided you with documentation (the non-secret kind) that contradicts your claim that Johnson deflects responsibility from himself. You can start there.

    You can also post the text of the highway marker and allow us to see if it aligns with your characterization that it "suggests that Greensboro itself was involved."

    And share your non-public documents with us so we can decide for ourselves.

    Finally, you think it was right that Wray was forced out of office on trumped up misrepresentations?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Deleted mine too somehow so thank you for reposting. Wasn't my intention. Big people typing on small phones apparently.
    Roch, I have now re-read the entire GTRC report for a fourth time and STILL do not see any remarks from Johnson that shows any remorse. So, I went back to the web and actually found a 37 page written statement that he provided as testimony to the GTRC dated 8-26-2005. Still nothing. While more subtle, this is still the police's fault. You brought up my "wrong facts". Which ones are wrong Roch? Going back through my notes most everything I discussed is in the GTRC report; the interpretation my be different but all is in there.
    As for David Wray that is a different topic. Depends on which side of that coin you re on as to what may or may not have been "trumped up" or misrepresented.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Yes Brian, I agree that Glen Frazier is a piece of crap. No Brian I do not agree that the CWP is not extremist.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
  5. If wanting to wipe out white supremacist groups is "extremist", sign me up any day of the week. The FBI should have done this in 1979. I guess only muslims can be called terrorists (like dylan roof is NOT referred to as a terrorist). This is what I mean about white supremacy in our government. No CWP member that was there that day has killed before or since but we cant say the same thing about the enemy.
    Nope still see nothing extreme about CWP

    DEATH TO THE KLAN

    ReplyDelete
  6. Let me get this straight, you "accidentally" deleted nine comments? Is that what you are claiming, Mr. Ridgill?

    -- Roch Smith, Jr.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes Mr Smith, I accidentally deleted them. If I knew how to restore them I would. What's your point?

      Delete
  7. Actually it was four including a reply I had typed to the post that Mr Subversive restored for me.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Actually, it was 10, and my point is that I know a little something about Blogger and it would take ten clicks to delete ten comments. Agreed?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Usually that is how it works but they do not show up as deleted items on the comments category. These disappeared as I was trying to post a response. But again Roch, whats your point? (As if it is not obvious already)

    ReplyDelete
  10. I agree, the point is obvious already. Since you wish you had some way to restore the deleted comments, allow me.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Author, January 19, 2016 at 2:59 PM

    Your recitation of the facts is highly selective, prejudiced and, at times, just wrong. Such sloppy work doesn't deserve but a few minutes of my time that I will use to dispute your vilification of Rev. Nelson Johnson as having been able to "deflect any responsibility from himself" for the events of Nov. 3rd, 1979.

    While you say that you've read the Truth and Reconciliation Report, you must have missed the written testimony by Nelson Johnson that included a section entitled "Regrets, Self-Criticism and Apologies" in which he does just exactly what you ignorantly accuse him of not doing.

    You might also find it hard to maintain your venom for Johnson by watching this video about him seeking grace and redemption, including with one of the Nazi shooters on his death bed.

    I found Johnson's hope for Greensboro he describes towards the end of the video infinitely more inspiring and dignified than the bile you write here.

    This excerpt from Johnson's testimony to the T&RC remains, unfortunately, still relevant in light of your post:

    "Under such a cloud of distortions, we have found very few empathetic ears that would listen to the difficult and painful events related to the killings of our relatives and our loved ones. In addition to the loss of life, injuries, disruption of careers and families, we’ve had to endure ongoing perversion of the context, a constant stream of distortions of the facts as well as demeaning assaults on our motives and characters."

    -- Roch Smith, Jr.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Marc Ridgill January 19, 2016 at 3:18 PM

    I respect your position especially because you signed your name. The facts in this case would fill a book and certainly would take a long time to cover in one blog article. As to the facts that are "just plain wrong" I will welcome discussion but I am in possession of documents thst are not public so I stand by the content. There is much more. As for "villification" his effect on city decisions especially with regards to police discipline is "just plain wrong". The facts of this case have never been accurately poryrayed. If the current trend of bashing police officers doesnt stop soon there wont be a department. This city is very close to being Baltimore.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I remember the last time there were documents that were not public that people described in ways to impugn and disparage other people, it was the RMA report that was used to push former police chief David Wray and his command staff out of office.

    The lesson Greensboro learned from that sad episode was that people will describe secret documents as it suits them. So, unless and until you make them public, supporting your position with secret information simply undermines your position as uncorroborated.

    As to the wrong facts you are willing to discuss, by all means, proceed. I provided you with documentation (the non-secret kind) that contradicts your claim that Johnson deflects responsibility from himself. You can start there.

    You can also post the text of the highway marker and allow us to see if it aligns with your characterization that it "suggests that Greensboro itself was involved."

    -- Roch

    ReplyDelete
  14. Marc Ridgill January 19, 2016 at 6:52 PM

    Let me rephrase. Not secret documents. Documents that have not been cited by the GTRC. Actions speak louder than words Roch. I read the reports. I also know the evidence that gets left out every time some committee or some group try to rewrite history. My final question stands; if Johnson does not do those three things does this event happen?
    As for the David Wray situation, thats a completely different topic. But I have a feeling we disagree at least to a point on that one too.

    Marc Ridgill January 19, 2016 at 6:57 PM

    The very title Greensboro Massacre is factually incorrect. If you want to recognize the event as two radical extremist groups that had a shoot out that occured in Greensboro, that would be factual.

    Mr. Subversive January 19, 2016 at 7:08 PM

    There is nothing radical or extremist about the CWP.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Mr. Subversive January 19, 2016 at 6:11 PM

    This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Mr. SubversiveJanuary 19, 2016 at 6:12 PM

    Because of racist scum such as Glen Miller Frazier I maintain that the CWP should have come strapped to the gills ready to wipe the KKK off the face of the earth.

    DEATH TO THE KLAN.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Mr. Subversive January 19, 2016 at 6:15 PM

    The GPD is looking for new recruits.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RygcejCRLKA

    You whine too much about communists. Here is some non extremist, non racist information that you could use.

    http://revcom.us/

    DEATH TO THE KLAN.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Author January 19, 2016 at 7:47 PM

    As to the wrong facts you are willing to discuss, by all means, proceed. I provided you with documentation (the non-secret kind) that contradicts your claim that Johnson deflects responsibility from himself. You can start there.

    You can also post the text of the highway marker and allow us to see if it aligns with your characterization that it "suggests that Greensboro itself was involved."

    And share your non-public documents with us so we can decide for ourselves.

    Finally, you think it was right that Wray was forced out of office on trumped up misrepresentations?

    ReplyDelete
  19. Thank you Roch for restoring the comments. I went back once more and specifically read the section you refer to in Mr. Johnson's written testimony. I stand by my article. While he makes reference to using "Death to the Klan" as being a mistake he then says "it was not used on the flyer". That is false. It was used on both the China Grove and the November 3rd documents. He says the use of the word "communism" was a mistake though he then tries to depict the views of his "friends" as somehow meaning something different. He accuses the "establishment" of renaming the march a "Death to the Klan" march though clearly that was stated before as well as during the rally by Nelson and his supporters. He refuses to acknowledge any responsibility for his part in the Klan being there. Everything in that section of "regrets" is accompanied by a "yeah but" and then an accusal of it being the Police Department's fault.
    You accuse me of wrong "facts". Name them.
    You say my article is "bile". The US Constitution protects your opinion. But in the end, your interpretation of the documentation is just that; your opinion. What is "bile" to you is truth in this city to thousands of others.
    In researching some of your blogging history most folks in Greensboro give you credit for basically bringing the written blog to Greensboro. You are obviously an innovator and more adept at using the computer than most and certainly more than I. That does not mean however that you can simply shout down someone else's work or point of view simply because you disagree. Criticize if you like; I have zero problem with different perspectives. But leave the condescension at the door as your opinion is no more valuable than mine or anyone else's.
    You like Nelson; fine. I read his words that you quoted and watch the video and they simply do not match his actions. He has caused divisiveness not only in Greensboro but within the African American community and even within the Pulpit Forum. He is currently in a position of great influence on our current city council and you also seem very "fond" of them through your recent history. As long as he gets his way, he is quiet. The only time they have gone against his wishes the past 5 or so years (Police Chief selection) what did we get? "Greensboro, Ferguson....Ferguson, Greensboro"; not exactly harmony inspiring.
    Your veiled accusations aside there is not one "opinion" and certainly no "specific" evidentiary argument that you have presented that makes your OPINION more than that. My question at the end of this article stands. Answer or avoid it if you choose. In the end my only concern when writing this blog is to give a voice to city employees and police officers that they currently do not have in Greensboro. My focus is maintaining the trust of those folks, their families and supporters. While I respect your right to have an opinion, it is no more important than mine.
    As you seem to be given credit for releasing to the public the RMA report, I can only imagine what you find wrong with that. I also find it interesting that you would even bring it up. The term "trumped up misrepresentations" is certainly subjective no matter what my opinion on that entire episode is.
    As for your insinuation that I deleted the comments purposely so be it; you must possess some sort of secret power to judge my character without ever having met me.

    ReplyDelete
  20. ridgill is still saying "death to the klan" is somehow bad. Why do you support the KKK in such ways ridgill?? The KKK needs to be handled like the terrorist cell they are and if the FBI refuse to step in to stop this, it is up to the people to do it instead.

    Bile is a common feature of the ridgill writing style and he also claims to have some sort of secret power to judge people without having met them.

    It's hilarious that you do not support higher wages for city workers but think that somehow your edited version of their "voice" seems to serve them. In fact your "views" serve the police to the detriment of the public.

    Nelson Johnson is a bit too conservative for the people of greensboro but at least his heart is in the right place.

    DEATH TO THE KLAN

    ReplyDelete
  21. Brian, we've met. Spin away on the KKK stuff, you know better. The higher wage thing you keep referencing is ridiculous too and you know it. Besides if you were so upset with the wage argument you would be questioning the "colesium" exception. Are you now turning on your mentor?

    ReplyDelete
  22. I think that any city wage less that $12.00 an hour only serves to keep the worker in poverty.

    Why do you refuse to declare the KKK to be terrorists?? Death to the klan is the best thing we as the public can do to stop racism.

    Malcolm X wasn't "turning" on MLK when he considered him to be too conservative.

    DEATH TO THE KLAN

    ReplyDelete
  23. Isnt any person or group that commits violence in the name of a religion or extreme philosophy or point of view to those who disagree commiting an act of terror? Be they far right or far left? I have been very clear on my views of ALL extreme philosophies. All youre interested in is ending extremism on the right. Im for ending extremism period including your favorite brand, communism.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There is nothing extreme about communism and definitely nothing extreme about exterminating the KKK. You do not have enough wealth to benefit from capitalism, in fact I doubt you even KNOW someone who is rich enough to benefit from capitalism. Communism benefits the poor at the expense of the rich, which is just fine and dandy and that jesus guy recommended it too. Look up "christian communism" and get back with me about how a "christian nation" can be capitalist. What is so "extreme" about communism, is it making sure the rich are kept in their place and are not predatory, greedy lazy moochers who do no actual labor while those who make them rich live in near poverty, (walmart and mcdonald's are SHINING examples of lazy moochers sponging off the labor of their workers.

      You jump up and down over a system that exploits you too. To the donald trumps of this world we are ALL meaningless peasants, do you really think that billionaire guy is looking out for YOUR interests??
      DEATH TO THE KLAN

      Delete
  24. "But leave the condescension at the door as your opinion is no more valuable than mine or anyone else's."

    That's where you are wrong. An opinion floating free from the facts or based on information you characterize but do not produce is inferior. I have provided sources with links. People can view the resources themselves for cooroboration. You? No.

    So, prove me wrong. Prove your opinion is as valid as mine. Produce these documents that support your opinion -- or, just stomp your feet and declare that your opinion is just as good as anybody's, it really means very little to me.

    -- Roch

    ReplyDelete
  25. "He is currently in a position of great influence on our current city council and you also seem very "fond" of them through your recent history."

    Another opinion untethered from the facts. Hell, I was so dissatisfied with them I made the really, really huge mistake of voting for you. I'm glad my fellow citizens knew better than I did. I had no idea you harbored such contempt.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Luckily in this city of 200,000 only 400 people voted for this loser. He an 8-track tape in an MP3 world as far as his attitude on police and the public. He wants the police to be able to police themselves with no PUBLIC outside scrutiny not controlled by our city, it's like the police are not accountable to the public they alledge to "protect and serve"

      Delete
  26. "As you seem to be given credit for releasing to the public the RMA report, I can only imagine what you find wrong with that. I also find it interesting that you would even bring it up."

    I don't know who gives me credit for releasing the RMA report. I did not. Someone posted it to Greensboro 101 the site I created and maintain.

    I thought I was pretty clear about why I was bringing it up, but let me try again. Your trumped up misrepresentations remind me of what happened with the RMA report, when the News & Record characterized (very wrongly, as it turned out), documents it declined to make public. Self-interested elected officials capitalized on that to promote a narrative that impugn people. (But not for the herculean dedication of Jerry Bledsoe would we have ever known the truth.)

    The way you write, the accusations you make, based on characterizations that are contrary to public documents or that you claim rely on secret documents remind me very much of the tactics used by those who launched and justified the David Wray putsch. Your target just differs but its the same sleazy tactic.

    Does that clear it up?

    ReplyDelete
  27. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Marc, you have plenty of support. Keep it up.
    KSQ-662

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It should have been a shootout. DEATH TO THE KLAN

      Delete
  29. Thanks for voting for me Roch. The GTRC report contains several of the items I have mentioned. The evidence that was presented in the criminal trial is also public record now that the case has been adjudicated. These documents are part of the public record. As for any "secrets" the personnel laws work against officers as well. Nelson Johnson has been directly involved in the city manager ruling against officers that not only made lawful arrests but in one case did a suspect a huge favor by not charging him with a felony. My opinion of the characters (including one of Nelson''s current disciples Mr Subversive) is based on 29 years of having to deal with his group and not being able to respond. Notice how Mr Subversive still uses the catch phrase.
    Your views on Bledsoe I will be glad to discuss in person.
    The bottom line is that for whatever reason you have become so angry you still havent answered the question nor have you specifically pointed out any one fact that is wrong. You have cited documentation that is subject to interpretation that can certainly be swayed based on individual experiences. My experiences with Nelson Johnson and his group have not been positive. The words you cite do not match his actions.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Brian, since you claim to represent left wing extremism and are advocating violence against the police and opposite thinking groups, by your reasoning does that not make you a "terrorist"? Your mentor can afford to be more "conservative" now as he has you to make all the public noise.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The "opposite thinking group" you refer to is the KKK. Screw them and anyone who stands up for them.

      I am not an extremist, I am pro little guy, that's all there is to it. You are pro oppressor I am pro oppressed.

      You are still too poor to benefit from capitalism as it stands now. There are numerous papers by prominent academic professionals proving this. I suggest you do some research about the boot that is on YOUR neck too. If ISIS killed 1200 people last year, like american police did the republinazi's would be SCREAMING the word terrorism.

      I call for vigorous citizen patrols to prevent and circumvent cases of abuse by police. I do not call for wanton unprovoked attacks. Defense methods should only be used if the officer refuses to stop harming the person in question.

      Claiming to have met someone who has never met you is a sure sign off being a stalker, it's as if you are implying that you are "watching me". The case is clearer and clearer for YOU being a police stalker, a stalker who represents the police but is legally "retired" so your stalking can't be pinned on them.

      Delete
  31. There are lots of officers that have met you as you carry on in public that you probably wouldnt recognize because all you ever see and react to is the uniform. I just retired 18 months ago. I have seen your act in person. As for your "little guy" thing, whatever. Make up your mind; am I an oppressor or too poor to be an oppressor? No pne that reads your FB page or watched your Youtube videos is gonna buy the "little guy" advocate stuff. You are nothing more than anti police.

    ReplyDelete
  32. If I were anti police I wouldn't praise chief Scott for beginning the steps to make sure police no longer target black people. I hear great things about Henson too. But keep telling pro police lies. To many segments of the community that uniform is nothing but a gang symbol that represents a group of people that killed 1200 people last. Now we have to get the public trained on knowing their rights and stopping police abuse if they witness it and things will be better.
    death to the klan

    ReplyDelete
  33. Your FB page and rhetoric is there for all to see. By the way, 1200 is inaccurate. See you next article Brian.

    ReplyDelete
  34. How many were killed by cops then, genius??? Still threatening to make people "famous" I see. Many people consider the "rhetoric" to be a way to unchain the people from this brutal RACIST police state we live in now.

    DEATH TO THE KLAN

    ReplyDelete
  35. Marc, beware of arguing with idiots! They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ridgill uses excessive force to beat you with instead

      Delete